Brigadier Priyanka is entitled to diplomatic immunity; Westminster court decision is politically motivated; Says Ministry of foreign relations

Saturday, 07 December 2019 - 17:06

Brigadier+Priyanka+is+entitled+to+diplomatic+immunity%3B+Westminster+court+decision+is+politically+motivated%3B+Says+Ministry+of+foreign+relations
The judgement in the case of Brigadier Priyanka Fernando, the trial of which was completed at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 19th November 2019, was delivered by the Chief Magistrate of the Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 6 December 2019.

The Chief Magistrate delivered the judgement under Section 4A of the Public Order Act of the UK and imposed a lower notional financial penalty, but did not consider it appropriate to issue a warrant.

The Judge, who had previously ruled that the defendant was not protected by diplomatic immunity, did not revisit that ruling.

She had also rejected the abuse of process argument.

The Government of Sri Lanka continues to maintain that Brigadier Fernando as a diplomat who was attached to the Sri Lanka High Commission in London is entitled to diplomatic immunity as per Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961.

In January 2019, at the time summons was first issued by the Magistrate’s Court of Westminster, the then British High Commissioner was summoned by the Foreign Secretary and a  protest was lodged against the legal proceedings in British Courts disregarding diplomatic immunities of Brigadier Priyanka Fernando in respect of the alleged incident.

A request was made through the British High Commission in Colombo that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, take necessary steps to ensure a review of the process including the order of the Magistrate’s Court of Westminster to correct the Court’s misunderstanding of International Law and the lapse on the part of the Court administration to bring to the attention of the Magistrate the contents of the Diplomatic Note sent by the Government of Sri Lanka claiming immunity.

The sequence of events – the private prosecution, failure to uphold Brigadier Fernando’s diplomatic immunities,  the timing of the delivering of the judgement on the eve of the UK elections, the alleged unruly behaviour of the supporters of the prosecution during Court hearings who were also carrying LTTE flags during these hearings, the alleged leaking of privileged information submitted in Court by the defence to the public domain by the private prosecution, makes abundantly clear that this is a politically motivated action.


Several houses in Polonnaruwa damaged due to strong winds
Saturday, 28 November 2020 - 13:21

It has been reported that several houses have been slightly damaged due to trees falling as a result of a strong wind that blew across several areas in... Read More

Organized gang preparing for a clash arrested
Saturday, 28 November 2020 - 13:19

Five members of an organized crime gang who were preparing for a clash were arrested with sharp weapons in the Midigama area in Weligama last night. Police... Read More

17 more infected in the Kandy hospital
Saturday, 28 November 2020 - 13:15

Two nurses working at the ENT Clinic at the Kandy National Hospital were diagnosed with coronavirus infection yesterday.During the PCR tests conducted... Read More